Liesel D - 1364284
-
Posts
390 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by Liesel D - 1364284
-
-
Cheers Louie! I think the UK has an advantage with higher traffic and membership, so booking a position is probably more rewarding than down here. I can say that a similar system will be developed, although like I said a booking will not be binding.
-
1
-
-
Look in the files section of the unofficial Facebook group
-
1
-
-
Hi John,
If the SELCAL code for the aircraft isn't in the cockpit for whatever reason, http://www.airframes.org/ seems to have the SELCAL code for virtually any IRL aircraft registration I search for. You will need to make an account to access the results.
For example, I search for Nancy Bird Walton (OQA) and this comes up:
egistration Manuf. Model Type c/n i/t Selcal ICAO24 Reg / Opr built test reg delivery prev.reg until next reg status VH-OQA Airbus A380-842 A388 14 L4J BQCH 7C4920 QFA [QF] Qantas 2008 F-WWSK 2008-09-20 F-WWSK active edit Remarks: named "Nancy-Bird Walton", damaged 2010-11-04 after engine failure, landed safely at Singapore, on repair until end of 2011.
Hope this helps
-
1
-
-
33 minutes ago, Tristan Garratt said:
Oh really? Have we ever tried cross over events on days? i.e a crossover spilt milk run, NZCH - NZAA or something, have vatpac and vatnz, and then another spmrm from SY-BN but have vatnz join?
QuoteOh, we have definitely had cross-over events, but someone else will need to comment on how those played out.
-
1
-
-
I think VATNZ tried a Wednesday night event, and I think that failed sadly. Although VATNZ as you can see with their SNO barely attracts that much traffic to events other than their core group, similar to the VFR nights here.
Also, please don't quote the entire post if it's stupid long, it makes it harder to read the thread on small screens.
-
-
2
-
-
43 minutes ago, Zach Biesse-Fitton said:
I was even building something about a year and a half ago along these lines. Still have the code on my computer!
If you’re happy for me to keep going with that and incorporate into core, feel free to send me a line on Discord
-
“Macos “ is just macOS/OS X poorly formatted, haha. I’m not sure about the file format issue, I’ll investigate and report back on that one. The crash to desktop: could be related to using the demo copy outside of the Seattle demo area?
-
Jacob is correct. This is in the works.
-
If you're ready to spend up to $900, that's a Nvida Geforce GTX 1070 at least right there. But, considering your CPU, that would be quite the unwise purchase. I would actually suggest building a new rig altogether, even better if you can save another $500 or so. My rig with a i7 7700K and GTX1060 costed around $1500. If you can only do $900, then a lower cost chip (Ryzen?) and a 1060 could do you wonders.
-
1
-
-
I think TAAATSMod is the issue in the crashes (referring to Tristan). I've always had to run ES as an admin to avoid the hourly CTDs. Maybe it's because of C++? Who knows!
-
1 hour ago, Tristan Garratt said:
Why not deactivate them :wink:
Matt stayed calm even though my Euroscope crashed multiple times. He did very well!
Trying running ES as administrator.
-
Would you happen to have the RFDS livery for the Carenado PC-12?
-
How small is this community again?
-
Even if it is in the interest of absolute realism, this is VATSIM. Sadly we can't really simulate every single part of ATC in Australia. And regardless, if it were added (very likely as a non-standard), how many times would it even be activated? Even for a real-ops event like in Sydney a month or so ago, barely any VFR aircraft came.
-
Why do we need any more positions? Surely there isn't enough traffic to require it.
-
2
-
-
I was on the frequency tonight with him and I can vouch for every part of that. Well done Nicolas!
-
1
-
-
Good job!
-
1
-
-
Nice one Brett
-
5 minutes ago, Tristan Garratt said:
That is not what I meant,
Rather, Ban them from the booking system. They can still control, But to stop them from abusing the booking, Just ban them from the booking system.
This won’t happen considering a booking system won’t be binding
-
1
-
-
We actually had a SMRM in Darwin down to Alice this time last year or so. It was like the rad Radelaide one a couple months ago. Maybe the Adelaide one was helped by it being a route involving Melbourne?
-
19 minutes ago, Eoin Motherway said:
I still don't really see the point of booking systems imho.
It'll just cause a fuss for people who want to control, but don't want to commit to times. Traffic could be low and I could log off early. Traffic could be high and I could stay on later until it clears. that could go into someone else booking, then we start arguing about me being on their spot when they've booked it.
Then you have the tools who jump on your spot 0.000000000001524ms before you've booked it, thus stopping you from logging on...
The first come, first served basis has always been fair
Agreed. I will still look into making a notification system where people can get a rough idea.
-
3
-
-
Ortho in Australia (Bing maps) is excellent. There are good quality sceneries available for all capital city airports along with a lot of regional airports however the freeware quality obviously won't rival FlyTampa. Some people choose to convert scenery, which is probably against most EULAs so do so at your own risk.
-
This isn’t Macintosh level innovation Tristan. I support Quig’s suggestion, take a look at other FIRs.
ATC/flight booking feature
in Feedback, Suggestions and Ideas
Posted
I mean, I don't mind developing one regardless. If someone wants to use it, it will be there. I agree David that it will require a cultural change for significant use.